COVID-19
is impacting on all aspects of family life and personal relationships, as well
as on our formal and informal systems of social care. How are we ‘doing’ family
life and practicing intimacies during lockdown? What are the consequence on our
intergenerational relations – with the youngest and oldest – and how are we protecting
those most vulnerable? And what effect has physical distancing had on our connections
to strangers, to community life, to civil society and the environment around
us?
At CRFR we are inviting our network of researchers, policy makers and practitioners to share their
experiences and reflections. How has the pandemic affected the community in
which you live and work? What are the challenges you have faced so far, and
what are your expectations – good and bad – for the future?
COVID-19 has been declared a global pandemic, with households and
communities facing significant restrictions on their everyday life. The most
immediate impact of the lockdown has been on our families and relationships.
For those now working at home this has meant having to spend more time - like
it or not – with members of our own households, physically distanced from wider
family, friends and everyday social contacts. Children are at home from school,
forcing some parents into the monumental task of juggling paid work from home with
child care and home-schooling. Couples are reflecting on the consequences of
this unexpected togetherness on their relationship, while those living alone
are having to cope with only remote interactions. Our everyday connections to
strangers have also been altered – in the shops that remain open and in our
public spaces we are navigating around each other; stepping off pavements and
crossing roads to maintain distance. We have yet to find a collective means of
responding to the transgressions that occur – like everything else, we are all
finding our way round this ‘new normal’. Necessity being the mother of
invention, this distance has provoked new ways of retaining our social
connections with each other. Social spaces, whether the pub, club, public
library, gym or theatre have transitioned into on-line spaces, while family gatherings
and chats to elderly relatives are being practiced via video conferencing.
The tag-line, “we are all in this together” works well when we
think about the speed with which we have re-established our social lives
on-line. However, the narrative of the coronavirus as a “great leveller” has
already begun to unravel. While the effects of COVID-19 are universal, these
effects are not experienced equally or evenly, and for many are serving to reinforce current hierarchies and
exclusions. As with the austerity measures that preceded the pandemic,
those with greater economic and social capital are better placed to navigate
the worst effects of the lockdown. More affluent households typically have
larger houses and gardens, better access to the internet and technology, and
greater social and digital capital through which to access practical and emotional
support (on-line deliveries, home-based exercise, home school resources). So,
while some households are enjoying Waitrose home deliveries, the functioning of our society continues to
be reliant on the lowest-paid workers who are not only unable to quarantine
themselves, but are also less likely to have secure employment or stable
housing.
Such inequity is, of course, also intersectional. In the UK, it
has been reported that low-paid women are at a higher risk of exposure to
Covid-19 as they are more likely to be in frontline jobs such as social care,
nursing and pharmacy. And there are already indications that there has
been a rise in the incidence of domestic abuse directly attributable to Stay at
Home. Meanwhile, the mortality trends emerging in the UK and globally reveals a
racially disproportionate rate of death, with the pandemic bringing poverty and
ethnicity together in a 'perfect storm'.
On the other side of the coin, the pandemic has nourished
localism, cooperation, mutual support. In Scotland over 60,000 people
registered for a volunteering campaign to help tackle the Covid-19 crisis. Social
media is bursting with accounts of locally based initiatives which are helping
the most vulnerable, and of the everyday kindnesses of neighbours, frontline
workers and strangers. These experiences, alongside widely reported positive
environmental impacts, narrate the virus as a means through which individuals
can deepen social connections to families, friends, neighbours and community.
As we all navigate the early days of the pandemic, the Centre for Research on Families and Relationships welcomes
blog submissions issues from academics and practitioners working within the
field of families and relationships. Submissions can include, but are not
limited to, reflections on the topics discussed above, as well as reflections on
the long-term effects of the coronavirus on service delivery, funding and
practice. We are also keen to learn more about how COVID-19 and the
prospect of long-term physical distancing is re-shaping the design and delivery
of research fieldwork and writing projects. Covid 19 caused the
cancellation of CRFR’s international conference Intersectionality, Families Relationships. A number of the participants have promised to
write blogs for us and these will appear in the coming weeks.
We welcome reflections on personal experience as well as our more usual style of pieces informed by research or professional practice. You may also submit diaries, photos or other visuals. Your contributions should be between 600-1,500 words and should be submitted in Word format to Helen Walker (helen.walker@ed.ac.uk). For referencing, the use of hyperlinks (instead of footnotes) is preferred, where possible. Please include the author’s full name, current institution and occupation in a short bio at the end of the document. The contributions will be reviewed by CRFR co-directors and we aim to get back to you with decisions within a fortnight of submission.
We welcome reflections on personal experience as well as our more usual style of pieces informed by research or professional practice. You may also submit diaries, photos or other visuals. Your contributions should be between 600-1,500 words and should be submitted in Word format to Helen Walker (helen.walker@ed.ac.uk). For referencing, the use of hyperlinks (instead of footnotes) is preferred, where possible. Please include the author’s full name, current institution and occupation in a short bio at the end of the document. The contributions will be reviewed by CRFR co-directors and we aim to get back to you with decisions within a fortnight of submission.
Amy Chandler, Emma Davidson, Jenni Harden and Lynn
Jamieson
No comments:
Post a Comment