CRFR co-director Dr Emma Davidson summarises the key themes emerging from our recent seminar reflecting on
the emergent ACE (Adverse Childhood Experiences) and resilience agenda in
Scotland.
We began a conversation on ACEs and resilience in December 2017 at the seminar,
‘The Troubling Concept of Resilience’, where Dr Eric
Carlin and myself voiced our concerns that the dominant narrative on resilience could obscure inequalities; penalising
individuals by making them responsible for their own wellbeing. Since then, we have
witnessed the mounting influence of ACE and resilience-focused policy in
Scotland. It is now even more important to provide a space in which popular
rhetoric on ACEs and resilience can be constructively and respectfully critiqued.
Our event on 6th
November 2018 aimed to reignite that process. We welcomed three speakers: Dr Amy
Chandler, Dr Cara Blaisdell and Laura Wright, each of whom talked from their perspective
of their own field of research.
Amy’s presentation (which you can
watch here)
examined the potentially counter-productive ways ACEs are used in research on
suicide and self-harm. Early experiences, Amy noted, are undeniably important
in shaping later risks of, or experiences with, suicide and self-harm. However,
there is a tendency to rely on a mechanical or ‘addictive’ analysis, with a
correlation drawn between early adversity and later problems. The work of
explaining what these correlations actually mean, or understanding the
mechanisms behind them, are less well developed. Drawing on her own research,
Amy highlighted that this focus can mean that interpretation and meaning is
omitted – what do adverse experiences mean and feel like to different people, at
different times? And how are social and political conditions implicated in
this? Also absent, Amy suggested, is the role of agency. The popular narrative
of resilience plays into the long standing stigmatisation of mental health
problems as being associated with weakness. This way of thinking about
resilience implies that those experiencing self-harm and suicide are not
resilient. The reverse can in fact be
true, with the practice of self-harm being evidence of extreme resilience in
extreme circumstances.
Dr Cara Blaisdell’s work picked up on
this critique within an early years setting (read Cara’s new blog here).
She highlighted the potential for the ACE agenda in Scotland to reinforce what
Tuck (2009)
refers to as a ‘damage narrative’. Rather than holding those in power to
account, these narratives can reinforce particular ideas about children and
society: where the ‘poor’ child is a site of damage to self and society; where
professional labels children and seek to ‘fix’ them; and where structures of
oppression remain unchallenged and unchanged. Cara’s made the acute observation
‘what you focus on is what grows’. This is not a denial that bad things happen,
but rather an acknowledgement that deficit based models can label, provoke
normative ideas (of family, of parenting, of childhood). Ultimately deficit
models stigmatise, and they leave little room for the complex meaning making emphasised
by Amy as being so crucial.
Our final speaker was Laura Wright who
raised what is an under-acknowledged issue within ACEs – and that is the role
and status of children’s rights. Scotland is, noted Laura, a country recognised
as a global leader in children’s meaningful
participation. This work is supported by multiple organisations, initiatives
(we are now coming to the end of the Year of Youth People) and
legislation (i.e. Children and Young People (Scotland_ Act 2014).
A tension, nonetheless, remains between participation and protectionism – with
the latter superseding the former. The implications of this, argues Laura,
requires exploration. At present, children and young people have not been given
the opportunity to meaningfully participate in discussions about what is
included or excluded from the list of ‘adverse childhood experiences’. Indeed,
at an individual level, adults are completing checklists for children and young
people, and using this to make decisions about possible interventions. What,
asked Laura, does such an approach look like, and how it is given meaning
by children and young people? Critically, how can a plan designed to be
child-centred, like Getting it Right for Every Child, better engage children
and young people in active conversations about their own well-being?
There is – as Laura concluded – no
magic bullet. However, the speakers agreed that the way forward is not simply to
shift from asking ‘what’s wrong with you’, to ‘what happened to you’. Rather,
what is required is a move towards a strengths approach which asks what is
right with you, your family, your community and your society. On a practical
and pragmatic note, more reflection and time needs to be spent on how complex
ideas – such as meaning, context and interpretation – be meaningfully
incorporated in institutional structures and practices already under incredible
pressure.
We intend to continue
these conversations and look forward to seeing you at our forthcoming events.
There are four more seminars planned for 2019. Each will consider ACEs and
resilience through a different conceptual lens. These are:
·
ACEs
and foetal & infant development
·
ACEs,
resilience and gender
·
Resilience
in the Majority World
·
ACEs
and resilience in Scottish schools
We will be announcing
dates for these seminars in the New Year. Please subscribe to the CRFR website
for updates on this, and CRFR’s other events and research activities.
Further links
Drs Emma
Davidson and Eric Carlin reflect on their CRFR Informal Seminar ‘The Troubling
Concept of Resilience’.
Resilience – continuing the conversation
Resilience – continuing the conversation
CRFR
Associate PhD student Ariane Critchley provides her thoughts on resilience in
response to the recent CRFR Seminar ‘The Troubling Concept of Resilience’ given
by Eric Carlin and Emma Davidson.
How resilient do we want our children and young people to be?
How resilient do we want our children and young people to be?
Dr Caralyn Blaisdell
from the University of Strathclyde continues our discussion on the theme of
resilience and how this term is being used, with specific reference to early
years.
Resilience in early years – continuing the conversation
Resilience in early years – continuing the conversation
Laura Wright, University of Edinburgh talks
about engaging children in the ACE agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment