CRFR
international conference blog #CRFR2013
Eija Sevón is
presenting a paper at the CRFR international conference, 10-12 June 2013 Paper
Session 3, Tuesday 11 June
Parental authority
or, more precisely, the lack of it, has been a recent public debate in Finland.
My interest lies in an attempt to understand child-parent relations from the
perspective of young children aged 5 and 6.
The focus
of my paper lies in how we understand ideas of control, structure, discipline, setting
of limits, power and governance that have emerged from a range of disciplinary
approaches to the study of parent-child relations.
It has
been argued that an increased understanding of children’s rights has made
relations between parents and children more democratic. At the same time, the
family as an institution has been depicted as suppressing children’s voices and
decision making, as power and the right to speak have tended to remain the
prerogative of adults. This generational ordering of relations between children
and adults challenges us to think about and understand power relations between
children and parents, and how to study them from the viewpoint of young
children.
My conference presentation is based on my research
project on family relationships and parenting in everyday life from the
perspective of children (funded by the Academy of Finland). The aim is to better understand how
young children describe and make sense of their daily family lives and
parenting, and to hear their views on parental control and negotiations between
children and parents. The participants were 15 young children
aged 5 and 6 who created stories about challenging situations and negotations
between children and parents using a story-telling method.
The children’s stories relate adult-child power
relations of three different kinds.
The first is the power of parental authority which
requires children’s obedience; the second is negotiated power and agreements,
and the third is the power of resistance.
Children’s decisions to resist parental authority
shows them to be active agents who
interpret,
creatively participate in, mould and resist the rules and norms of adult culture.
The
children’s stories reveal their dependence on adults, but also challenge ideas of children’s
dependency and lack of power. In my presentation I want to share the children’s
stories and to discuss the validity and plausibility of the
interpretations of the children's stories about power relations with adults.
References
Alanen,
L. 2003. Childhoods: the generational ordering of social relations. In B.
Mayall & H.
Zeiher (Eds.)
Childhood in generational perspective. Univeristy of London: Institute of
Education, 27-45.
Corsaro,
W. 1997. The sociology of childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Kuczynski,
L. & Navara, G. S. 2006. Sources of innovation and change in socialization,
internalization
and acculturation. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.) Handbook of moral
development. New York: Psychology Press (reprinted 2010), 299-327.
No comments:
Post a Comment